What actually gets a spot in the library, and why some real submissions don't make it. Plain, short, no filler.
An entry has to clear all four:
Star count isn't a criterion by itself — a small, genuinely useful find belongs here the same as a big one, and a repo with thousands of stars still gets skipped if it's off-topic or there's nothing real to point at. What actually disqualifies an entry:
The library updates two ways, and they're not held to the same review standard on purpose. A nightly scan searches GitHub directly, already filtered to the seven tags, and publishes straight to the library with no human step in between — real data, pre-filtered by topic, lower stakes than a stranger's claim. A submission through the form below skips that pre-filtering entirely, so every one gets read by hand before anything's added. That's not a formality — it's the actual difference between the two paths.
No account or email is collected, so there's no way to notify you either way — the only signal is the library itself. If it clears the bar, it shows up there, tagged, with its own permalink. If it doesn't, nothing happens, and that's fine — most real, useful repos still won't fit seven tags and a dedup check on the first try.